Gulf Countries Issue Tepid Criticism of U.S. Over Golan Recognition

Saudi Arabia and several Gulf countries released short statements expressing regret over US President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize the Golan Heights as part of Israel. He signed a proclamation on Monday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The tepid response is part of a trend in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries to reduce criticism of Israel and to cultivate close relations with the Trump administration.

In a thirty-three word statement, Bahrain joined Riyadh in issuing a response to the US decision. “Bahrain’s foreign ministry reaffirms its position that the Golan Heights are an Arab and Syrian territories, occupied by Israel since June 1967, as it is confirmed by the resolutions of the UN Security Council.” Riyadh’s statement was slightly stronger, noting that the decision “will have significant negative effects on the peace process in the Middle East and the security and stability of the region,” a statement on Saudi Arabia’s state news agency SPA said. These joined Kuwait and the UAE in similar short responses.

The Golan decision has gone largely unnoticed in the region. While Turkey and Syria have issued robust condemnations, other countries have been relatively silent. Jordan appears more concerned that Romania is moving its embassy to Jerusalem, according to a speech by Romania’s Prime Minister Viorica Dancila at AIPAC. In addition, Iran is dealing with massive floods.

The Arab League, unsurprisingly, condemned the US move, but this appears more a necessary need to say something than real anger. This may be due to the fact that Israel has controlled the Golan for more than fifty years, twice as long as an independent Syrian regime ever controlled the area that Damascus claims as its own.

It is also because many of these southern Arab states want close relations with the Trump administration. They also have been stressing that they fear Iran more than they are concerned with Israel in recent years. Their main interest is in keeping the Israel-Palestinian conflict quiet so that the region can focus on Iran and also on other issues of stability after the defeat of ISIS.

Seth Frantzman is The Jerusalem Post’s op-ed editor, a Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum, and a founder of the Middle East Center for Reporting and Analysis.

A journalist and analyst concentrating on the Middle East, Seth J. Frantzman has a PhD from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and was an assistant professor at Al-Quds University. He is the Oped Editor and an analyst on Middle East Affairs at The Jerusalem Post and his work has appeared at The National Interest, The Spectator, The Hill, National Review, The Moscow Times, and Rudaw. He is a frequent guest on radio and TV programs in the region and internationally, speaking on current developments in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. As a correspondent and researcher has covered the war on ISIS in Iraq and security in Turkey, Egypt, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, the UAE and eastern Europe.
See more from this Author
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.