It’s Time to End the Small Palestinian Victories

“Victory belongs to the most persevering,” said Napoleon Bonaparte.

Bonaparte, who knew something of victory, is saying that victory is rarely overnight or quick, but takes time and patience.

Unfortunately for the State of Israel, its opponents are demonstrating that they believe they are on the road to ultimate victory through a series of smaller victories that demoralize their enemy.

According to Palestinian affairs expert Khaled Abu Toameh, the Palestinian rioters who turned a property dispute issue in the Sheikh Jarrah-Shimon HaTzaddik neighborhood into an international incident and ensured the removal of crowd-control barricades outside Damascus Gate were seen as having achieved a “big victory.”

The raining of rockets on Jerusalem during the celebrations on Jerusalem Day, and the hundreds still landing across the country causing loss of life, are a shameful message of impunity.

These victories are certainly emboldening for the Palestinians.

Israel’s enemies believe they are on the road to ultimate victory.

For many years, Middle East Forum president Daniel Pipes has been calling for an Israel victory over violent rejectionist Palestinians. As a historian, Pipes knows that in war and conflict, one side wins and one side loses. The losing side is the one who gives up its war aims and accepts defeat.

Tracing the conflict to its origins, he sees that it is not about land, settlements or occupation, but began as violent rejectionism against the aim of the Jewish people to reestablish sovereignty in their indigenous and ancestral homeland. That is why there were deadly riots and pogroms against Jews decades before the State of Israel came into being.

The Israel-Palestinian conflict is thus based on a war of narratives, but with deadly consequences. For it to end, either Israel or the Palestinians must give up.

We know what would happen if Israel gave up, so the Jewish state must do everything possible to ensure that the Palestinian leaders give up, by finally “crossing the Rubicon” and accepting the legitimacy of Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people.

This recognition would end the conflict, which is why no Palestinian leader has accepted any of the generous proposals, from 1937 to 2008, of an independent Palestinian state. Israel should be working hard towards this end.

In the past, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu correctly preconditioned returning to negotiations on Palestinian acceptance of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. For many in the West, this is pure evasion and irrelevant semantics.

Nonetheless, the Palestinians do not see it this way and resist this formulation strongly.

In 2014, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas said, “They are pressing and saying, ‘no peace without the Jewish state.’ There is no way. We will not accept.”

In other words, even if there is no peace, Israel’s status as the national homeland of the Jewish people will never be recognized. For people like Abbas, the conflict can persist, and people will continue dying because his refusal is the crux of the conflict.

Israel’s show of weakness on multiple fronts is celebrated on the Palestinian street.

Abbas’s position, like that of Hamas and other rejectionist groups, continues to be vindicated by recent events. Israel’s recent show of weakness on multiple fronts is celebrated on the Palestinian street.

On Friday, Arab residents of eastern Jerusalem chanted on the Temple Mount: “We are all Hamas, waiting for your orders, commander Mohammed Deif. Hamas, shoot a rocket at Tel Aviv tonight.”

Palestinians think that Israel does not have the perseverance to be victorious. Possibly, there are even Israelis who are beginning to think this way. This is dangerous because it emboldens the violent rejectionists.

Palestinians think that Israel does not have the perseverance to be victorious.

Victory is obviously not won overnight but by a series of smaller victories that wear out one’s opponents. With each small victory, many rejectionist Palestinians see the greater victory at hand.

This is the perception, however wild it might seem, which is being perpetuated. Nonetheless, it can be turned back if Israel decides that it will no longer act as if it is in retreat.

Israel needs to start winning some small victories of its own. It needs to push back against the rejectionist Palestinians. It needs to first assert control, then provide deterrence against those who would seek harm to its citizens and act in favor of security.

In the latest conflict with Hamas in Gaza, “Operation Guarding of the Walls,” Israel should massively bombard Gaza and even enter and occupy it until the rocket infrastructure has been completely destroyed. While doing this, it should hermetically seal Gaza, cutting off the supply chain to Hamas and other terrorist organizations. It must do what all nations have and are doing to achieve victory, by beating its enemy into submission.

Israel must convince the average Palestinian that it is here to stay and should be accepted in full.

This would be a significant victory and would change perceptions and switch the momentum against violent Palestinian rejectionism. It would convince the average Palestinian that Israel is here to stay and should be accepted in full. This would have the important goal of bringing peace closer because the more Palestinians accept the legitimacy and permanency of the State of Israel, the more pressure would be put on their leaders to give up on their goals of ending the Jewish state.

This is a victory towards which Israel should be persevering.

Gregg Roman is director of the Middle East Forum. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.

Gregg Roman functions as the chief operations officer for the Forum, responsible for day-to-day management, communications, and financial resource development. Mr. Roman previously served as director of the Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh. In 2014, he was named one of the ten most inspiring global Jewish leaders by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. He previously served as the political advisor to the deputy foreign minister of Israel and worked for the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Mr. Roman is a frequent speaker at venues around the world, often appears on television, and has written for the Hill, the Forward, the Albany Times-Union, and other publications. He attended American University in Washington, D.C., and the Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) in Herzliya, Israel, where he studied national security studies and political communications.
See more from this Author
Assad’s Chemical Weapons Stockpiles and Military Infrastructure Are Vulnerable to Exploitation, Transfer, or Misuse
The World Often Rewards Those Who Shout the Loudest Rather than Those Who Anchor Their Claims on Solid Ground
Washington and Jerusalem Must Act Now to Protect Security Interests Before Strategic Opportunities Disappear
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.