Western Islamists Denounce Killing of Zawahiri

Following the U.S. drone strike that killed Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, numerous Western Islamists have condemned the killing as “unjustified.”

Since the U.S. drone strike on July 30 that killed Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, a number of Western Islamists and their allies have denounced the U.S. government, claiming its operation “threatens peace” and was completely “unjustified.”

Zawahiri was killed in Kabul, where he was reportedly residing with the full knowledge of senior Taliban officials.

Writing in Rai Al-Youm, prominent Western Islamist Abdel Bari Atwan claimed that the strike was nothing more than a “theatrical stunt” designed to “salvage [Biden’s] reputation and presidency after they are miring in the mud of Afghanistan. He’ll surely fail. And a single retaliatory action by an al-Qaida supporter on a US target in Afghanistan or elsewhere could sink his presidency for good.”

The London-based journalist added that the Taliban is now being unfairly blamed, and is not guilty of harboring terrorists.

Atwan is a leading supporter of Palestinian Islamism and once claimed that he would “dance in Trafalgar Square” if Iranian missiles ever hit Israel.

Roshan Salih, editor of British Islamist publication 5 Pillars, covered Atwan’s commentary approvingly in his own outlet, and added on Twitter:

A statement published by the leading British Salafi organization, CAGE, declared that the killing of Zawahiri is a “clear violation of the US-Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Doha peace deal and brings back to centre stage the US’s unlawful drone programme. This further cements America’s perpetual war doctrine, which is primarily driven by the military industrial complex.”

According to the Wall Street Journal, CAGE’s head, Moazzam Begg, once “admitted that he was a jihadist recruiter, that he attended three al Qaeda terrorist-training camps in Afghanistan, and that he was armed and prepared to fight for the Taliban and al Qaeda against the U.S.”

In addition to CAGE’s statement, Begg tweeted:

The drone strike over the weekend in Kabul has shown again that USA is unwilling to abide by its promises. Recent years show scant evidence that 71 yr old #Ayman_al_zawahiri intended to target USA especially in light of Doha. However, instead of showing magnanimity in defeat 2/3 ... embittered USA continues to inflict suffering on the people of Afghanistan by freezing their hard earned money and forcing poverty and starvation on the population while claiming to bring “closure” to the never-ending #WaronTerror with another #extrajudicialkilling.”

Over the Atlantic in the United States, the Aafia Foundation claimed that the killing of Zawahiri was “The shame of Americanism. A never-ending commitment to killing...by conventional war, drone strike, or hunger!”

The Aafia Foundation is a registered 501c working to support and fundraise for convicted Al-Qaeda operative Aafia Siddiqui.

Meanwhile, Syed Haq, a New York-based Islamist activist and aspiring journalist, wrote that the killing would serve as a pretext for additional “surveillance on Muslims” by the federal government:

Fellow travelers also chimed in. The Center for Constitution Rights condemned the “extrajudicial killing” of Zawahiri and the “‘war on terror’ [that] has brought not a shred of justice, only suffering and destruction.” It may be relevant that one of the Center’s board members is Laila Al-Arian, a prominent Islamist activist and the daughter of convicted terrorist supporter Sami Al-Arian.

For all these examples of fury, however, the silence from other Islamist groups was more noticeable. Groups such as CAIR, which comment regularly on international affairs and U.S. drone strikes, appeared to remain curiously silent about the news of Zawahiri’s killing.

There were a few instances of support expressed for the operation by Islamist-tied individuals. Representative Ilhan Omar, a regular partner of American Islamist organizations, tweeted:

CAGE’s Moazzam Begg, however, seemed particularly unhappy with this statement, responding with:

Zahir Akhtar, a radical activist from a group named Documenting Oppression Against Muslims, echoed similar thoughts – demanding to know when “Bush and Blair” would be “targeted by US drones.”

Sam Westrop is director of Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.

Sam Westrop has headed Islamist Watch since March 2017, when MEF absorbed the counter-extremism unit of Americans for Peace and Tolerance (APT), where he was the research director. Before that, he ran Stand for Peace, a London-based counter-extremism organization monitoring Islamists throughout the UK.
See more from this Author
A Year After the October 7 Attacks, Hamas-Aligned Charities Tied to Violence Overseas, Continue to Operate with No Apparent Fear of Prosecution.
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.