Is Hamas Really Islamic? Is It ‘Extreme’ by Muslim Standards?

Winfield Myers

Although most in the West consider Hamas, which brutally massacred some 1,400 Israelis on October 7, 2023, to be anything from a terrorist to a nationalist movement, the group sees itself first and foremost as a religious—namely, Islamic—movement, dedicated to enforcing the draconian dictates of Muslim law (sharia), including through jihad.

“Hamas” means “zeal” in Arabic and is an Arabic acronym from harakat al-muqawamah al-islamiyyah (the Islamic Resistance Movement). The group is primarily concentrated in the Gaza Strip.

Hamas has the stated goal of replacing the entire state of Israel with a Muslim state governed by sharia. Jihad and Islamist indoctrination are its two principal means of instituting this new state.

Created primarily by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin in 1987 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas has the stated goal of replacing the entire state of Israel with a Muslim state governed by sharia. Jihad and Islamist indoctrination are its two principal means of instituting this new state.

Although its official membership is around 20,000, more than 200,000—5.26 percent of the then total population of the Palestinian Territories—attended the funeral procession for Sheikh Ahmed Yassin in 2004, suggesting that its local sympathizers are 10 times its official number.

A Commitment to Islamic Principles

In addition to its immediate goals, Hamas’ founding charter also illustrates the organization’s commitment to Islamic principles in general. The slogan—"Allah is its goal [theocratic rule], the Prophet its model [importance of sunna], the Koran its Constitution [sharia], Jihad [terrorism] its path, and death [suicide-bombings] in the cause of Allah its most sublime belief” —fully demonstrates its Islamic, as opposed to territorial or nationalistic, motivations.

Though most Hamas members are Palestinian Sunni Arabs, the charter “welcomes all Muslims who share its beliefs and thinking, commit themselves to its course of action, keep its secrets and aspire to join its ranks in order to carry out their duty.”

The Hamas Charter echoes the sentiment of observant Muslims in regard to the land of Palestine, all of which is believed to be “waqf land” that has belonged to Islam “since it was conquered by the Companion [Caliph Omar I] of the Prophet [c. 640].” In accordance with Islamic law, observant Muslims stress that the land of Palestine belongs to Islam and must therefore be re-conquered by Islam, not necessarily by Palestinians, but by Muslims. Hamas clearly defines “Nationalism as part and parcel of the religious faith,” thereby universalizing the notion of “nationalism” to include the entire Muslim umma, irrespective of actual nationality. And like global jihadists, Hamas clerics have publicly expressed their support for re-establishing the Caliphate.

Based on all the above, it is unsurprising that Hamas includes statements such as the following (from Article 7 of its charter):

The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews [related by al-Bukhari and Moslem].

Islamist Doublespeak

To achieve its immediate goal of an Islamic Palestinian state, Hamas has steadfastly denounced the Oslo Accords, the Annapolis conference, and other diplomatic efforts to establish a long lasting peace in the region, referring to them as “initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences ... [which] are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement.”

“The so-called peace process is futile,” Hamas leader Khaled Mashal declared in 2015. “There is no peace. Only the path of jihad, sacrifice and blood.”

“The so-called peace process is futile. There is no peace. Only the path of jihad, sacrifice and blood.” - Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, 2015

However, when addressing Western audiences, Hamas leaders (such as Ismail Haniyeh and Khaled Mashal) have stated that they are willing to recognize Israel with pre-1967 borders, even as the organization continues to reiterate, on a regular basis, its total rejection of Israel’s existence. Such doublespeak is a common Islamist tactic that finds its roots in Islam’s doctrine of deception, known as taqiyya, which the various PA factions even implement against one another.

As was the case with its parent organization, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas has gained the support of the Palestinian people by providing social and welfare services and by presenting itself as Israel’s implacable foe, as well as an opponent of the more corrupt, effete Fatah.

Imprinting the Minds of Generations of Muslims

Hamas is also steadily Islamicizing Palestinian society through indoctrination and propaganda. This method is a fundamental part of the organization’s charter: “We must imprint on the minds of generations of Muslims that the Palestinian problem is a religious one,” an “Islamic education based on the implementation of religious precepts [Sharia].” Hamas has gone to extreme lengths to indoctrinate young Palestinians into its beliefs, including the use of “jihadist” Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny lookalikes in its television programs.

Hamas’s principal sources of funding traditionally include Iran, which, according to the U.S. State Department, spends approximately $100 million annually supporting Palestinian groups including Hamas; private charities, including those operating in the West (the most notorious being the Holy Land Foundation, now defunct, which channeled $12 million to Hamas ); and individual donors from the Gulf States. Because of its refusal to normalize relations with Israel, Hamas has suffered economic setbacks since attaining power.

Between 1993 and 2009, the military wing of Hamas, the Izz ad-Din Qassam Brigades, is believed to have killed over five hundred people in more than 350 separate terrorist attacks, many of them suicide bombings. Since then, Hamas’s brigades have continued to launch rocket attacks against towns in southern Israel. By far, its most successful jihad occurred last October 7, 2023, when Hamas’s jihadists slaughtered 1,400 Israelis.

Raymond Ibrahim, author of Defenders of the West, Sword and Scimitar, Crucified Again, and The Al Qaeda Reader, is the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and the Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Raymond Ibrahim, a specialist in Islamic history and doctrine, is the author of Defenders of the West: The Christian Heroes Who Stood Against Islam (2022); Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (2018); Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013); and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). He has appeared on C-SPAN, Al-Jazeera, CNN, NPR, and PBS and has been published by the New York Times Syndicate, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Financial Times, the Weekly Standard, the Chronicle of Higher Education, and Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst. Formerly an Arabic linguist at the Library of Congress, Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, briefs governmental agencies, and testifies before Congress. He has been a visiting fellow/scholar at a variety of Institutes—from the Hoover Institution to the National Intelligence University—and is the Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum and the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
See more from this Author
The Incident Had Britons Protesting in the Streets Against the Government’s Unchecked Migration Policies
After Expelling Every Last Crusader from the Holy Land, Saladin’s ‘Retirement Dream’ Was to Invade and Wage Jihad on Christian Europe
The ancient concept of ‘ribat’ is a model for today’s bastions of Islamization and jihad.
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.