Israel Can Trust Hamas – To Keep Its Promises

Published originally under the title "Israel Can Trust Hamas."

Winfield Myers

When President Joe Biden says, “let there be no doubt: The United States has Israel’s back,” Israel should be skeptical. But when Hamas leaders promise to wage unending war until they annihilate all the Jews or die trying, Israel can trust that they mean it. Ironically, Jerusalem can trust its enemies more than its allies to keep their promises.

After the massacre on October 7, Biden at first reacted appropriately in remarks on October 10, calling it “an act of sheer evil” and Hamas “a group whose stated purpose for being is to kill Jews.” He said, “We stand with Israel,” promised “military assistance,” and acknowledged that “if the United States experienced what Israel is experiencing, our response would be swift, decisive, and overwhelming.” Time (prematurely) called Biden “America’s most pro-Israel president ever.”

When Hamas leaders promise to wage unending war until they annihilate all the Jews or die trying, Israel can trust that they mean it.

It didn’t take long for the State Department to revolt over Biden’s defense of Israel’s defending itself. Then, over 400 government employees (most of them Democrats) wrote a letter condemning Israel. It was only a matter of time before Biden would accede to the AOC-wing of his party and the entrenched anti-Israel bureaucracy at the State Department.

On October 25, Biden rightly expressed skepticism over the uncritically-repeated death count reported by the Hamas health ministry, declaring “I have no notion that the Palestinians are telling the truth about how many have been killed.” But the very next day, he apologized to a group of Muslim leaders at the White House for doing so, promising he would “do better” and adding, “I’m disappointed in myself.”

Soon, Biden’s Secretary of Defense, Loyd Austin (who demonstrated his expertise in the disastrous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan), was dispatched to Israel to advise the IDF how to wind down combat operations in Gaza. So much for standing with Israel.

Soon, Biden’s Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, began publicly warning Israel to protect civilians and blindly advocating a “two-state solution,” as though Hamas hadn’t just shown the world what a Palestinian state looks like. So much for having Israel’s back.

Hamas, on the other hand, has never wavered from its 1988 Charter (or “Covenant” as it is sometimes called) which proclaims that “there is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad” and declares that “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it.”

Eighteen years later, on January 25, 2006, one of the co-founders of Hamas named Mahmoud al-Zahar promised, after voting in the last election ever in Gaza, that Hamas “is not going to change a single word in its covenant.”

"[Hamas] is not going to change a single word in its covenant.” - Khaled Mashaal

After Hamas won that election, Khaled Mashaal, another Hamas leader, promised that “Hamas has a vision. Hamas has a plan. Hamas can manage the political battle, just like it managed the military battle, but in a different language, with different tools, and recognizing Israel is not one of them. Nor is giving up the rights, giving up the right to resistance, and nor is giving up the weapons of the resistance.”

In 2007, Hamas issued a statement assuring the world that, “We will not betray promises we made to God to continue the path of Jihad and resistance until the liberation of Palestine, all of Palestine.”

On June 15, 2010, Mahmoud al-Zahar reiterated his promise that "[t]his is our plan for this stage – to liberate the West Bank and Gaza, without recognizing Israel’s right to a single inch of land... We will not recognize the Israeli enemy.”

Hamas has kept this promise.

Since the October 7 massacre, Hamas has continued making promises.

On October 24, Gazi Hamad, a Hamas terrorist posing as a politician, told LBC TV in Lebanon that, “We will repeat October 7 attacks until Israel is annihilated.” He added that the October 7 attack “is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth, because we have the determination, the resolve, and the capabilities to fight.”

A Hamas “media consultant” named Taher El-Nounou told the New York Times for an article published on November 8 that, “the state of war with Israel will become permanent.”

On December 14, one of the Hamas billionaires, Mousa Abu Marzook, posted on X that “Hamas does not recognize the legitimacy of the Israeli occupation ... We confirm that the resistance will continue to liberation and return.”

Israel can have faith that Hamas intends to keep these promises too.

Israel can trust that Hamas, like Hitler, intends to keep its promises, all its promises, to the Jewish people.

When it comes to its ally, the U.S., there is perhaps only one thing that Israel can have faith in – that the Biden administration will continue to press Jerusalem into a “two-state solution,” even if it means accepting a Gaza in which Hamas retains power. As a State Department spokesman put it, “Ultimately, the future of Palestinian leadership is a question for the Palestinian people.” The problem is that the Palestinian people overwhelmingly (89%) support Hamas.

In Elie Wiesel’s autobiography of his years spent in Nazi death camps, Night (1958), he recounts how an old man dying of dysentery in Auschwitz once told him, “I have more faith in Hitler than in anyone else. He alone has kept his promises, all his promises, to the Jewish people.”

Israel can trust that Hamas, like Hitler, intends to keep its promises, all its promises, to the Jewish people.

A.J. Caschetta, a principal lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology, is a Ginsberg-Milstein Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and a senior fellow at the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

A.J. Caschetta is a principal lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology where he teaches English and Political Science. He holds a Ph.D. from New York University, where he studied the effects of the French Revolution and Reign of Terror on British society. After 9/11, he began focusing on the rhetoric of radical Islamists and on Western academic narratives explaining Islamist terrorism. He has written frequently for the Middle East Quarterly.
See more from this Author
If College Students Calling for a Boycott of All Things Israel Want to Live Up to Their Rhetoric, They Will End up Sick, Hungry, and Underemployed
Ultimately, Sinwar Can Aim Even Higher. Why Not Seek the Presidency of an American University?
Journalists and Editors Have Concocted a Way to Indemnify Hamas and Blame Israel for the Conflict by Calling It ‘Israel’s War in Gaza’
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.