Why Does the United States Operate Blind in Yemen?

Ahnaf Kalam

It has now been almost ten years since Houthi rebels, co-opted, armed and equipped by Iran, marched into Sana’a and seized the Yemeni government buildings. Rather than collapse under the weight of governance and the fact that as a tribal element, they were a minority lacking legitimacy through much of the country, the Houthis sank tentacles. Most Yemenis in and around Sana’a have no love for Saudi Arabia whose bombing killed thousands, but they say they fear Houthi checkpoints more. Errant Saudi bombs are accidents, but abductions and summary executions on the orders of Houthi commanders or their Iranian advisors are deliberate. So too is the starvation caused by Houthis embezzling international aid or denying it to towns and cities they consider disloyal.

Because Sana’a is unsafe, the United States has since 2014 stationed its Yemen country team in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This is backwards for three reasons.

Because Sana’a is unsafe, the United States has since 2014 stationed its Yemen country team in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This is backwards for three reasons.

First, given the history between the two neighbors even before the Houthi take-over, the U.S. decision to base its Yemen embassy in Riyadh has all the sensitivity of stationing a temporary U.S. Embassy to Ukraine in Moscow.

Second, putting the U.S. mission to Yemen in Saudi Arabia effectively excludes Yemenis. Saudi Arabia requires Yemenis to acquire visas to enter Saudi Arabia but it has closed its embassy in Sana’a making visa acquisition impossible. Certainly, Yemenis come illegally but they could never get by the gauntlet of Saudi security force that surround every embassy.

Lastly, putting the U.S. mission to Yemen outside the country represents a vote of no confidence in the state, especially when not all Yemen is a failed state. In many ways, Yemen has become analogous to Somalia. While Mogadishu and much of southern Somalia are the domain of warlords and terrorists, Somaliland has been democratic and stable for decades.

Southern Yemen’s stability is a more recent phenomenon than Somaliland’s, but it is just as real. While the Saudis struggled unsuccessfully to push back the Houthis, Emirati forces working in tandem with local forces drove out Al Qaeda elements who had occupied Aden, Mukalla and other towns and ports. Multiple flights depart Aden each day for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, or Djibouti; the Sana’a airport handles at most a single flight daily. Hotels in Aden thrive. Security has returned. Aden is safer today than Karachi, Peshawar, and many Latin American and African capitals. An American is more likely to be taken hostage in Beijing or Moscow than Aden.

That the United States has not at least temporarily relocated its Yemen embassy in Aden is itself an acknowledgment that Yemeni unity is a fiction. American diplomats know that northern Yemenis consider southern Yemen a foreign land and vice versa. Southern Yemen has more in common with Somaliland, with whom many southern Yemeni families share blood, than with the Houthi-dominated areas.

If the State Department cares about the Yemeni people and consolidating stability in a region where it is elusive, there can be no further delay to an official diplomatic office or consulate in Aden.

Just as with Somalia and Somaliland, however, neither the White House nor State Department have the foresight to acknowledge the benefits Yemeni disunity. Even short of recognizing southern Yemeni self-determination, maintaining a diplomatic office in Aden would bring huge diplomatic and security rewards at little cost. Southern Yemen may be secure now, but it was not long ago that Al Qaeda filled the vacuum. A U.S. presence tips the balance further by providing Yemenis hope and encouraging both Western and Arab investment. Intelligence also matters. Just as U.S. Embassy in Somalia reporting is risible given its blindness to dynamics in Somaliland where the State Department has no presence, the lack of a diplomatic office in Aden denies diplomats and intelligence analysts insight into local dynamics, including that across the de facto border in northern Yemen.

Revisionist powers are on the offensive, while the American presence erodes. In Yemen, this takes the form of Iranian support for the Houthis, while China operates its first overseas naval base just a couple dozen miles away in Djibouti. Rather than rectify the problem, the State Department appears aloof to it. If the State Department cares about the Yemeni people and consolidating stability in a region where it is elusive, there can be no further delay to an official diplomatic office or consulate in Aden.

Michael Rubin is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential. He is director of policy analysis at the Middle East Forum and senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Michael Rubin is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he specializes in Middle Eastern countries, particularly Iran and Turkey. His career includes time as a Pentagon official, with field experiences in Iran, Yemen, and Iraq, as well as engagements with the Taliban prior to 9/11. Mr. Rubin has also contributed to military education, teaching U.S. Navy and Marine units about regional conflicts and terrorism. His scholarly work includes several key publications, such as “Dancing with the Devil” and “Eternal Iran.” Rubin earned his Ph.D. and M.A. in history and a B.S. in biology from Yale University.
See more from this Author
It Would Shatter the Stigma the ICC Wishes to Attach to Netanyahu and Encourage Smaller Countries to Follow Suit
Azerbaijan’s Dictator Embraces the Khojaly Myth to Justify His Family’s Rule, but the United States and Others Should Not
What Is Certain in This Era of Uncertainty Is That U.S.-Cyprus Ties Will Not Only Remain Strong but Will Also Strengthen
See more on this Topic
Disinformation Given to Mainstream Media Normalizes News of the Supreme Leader’s Death and Could Suppress Protests When It Happens
Azerbaijan’s Dictator Embraces the Khojaly Myth to Justify His Family’s Rule, but the United States and Others Should Not
The Official Kurdish Population of the Soviet Union in 1926 Was 69,000, Many of Them in Azerbaijan