Hamid Dabashi writes: “How different are Bill Maher’s racist screeds from what a mass murderer wrote in his ‘manifesto'[?]...Someone explain to HBO executives the difference between that hate speech and this by the mass murderer in New Zealand...”
Dabashi’s assumption here is that if someone is violent in support of an idea, that idea is discredited and must be silenced. This is a monstrously hypocritical assumption for him to make, given the fact that he is a believer in the Qur’an, which has incited many of its adherents to violence for 1,400 years, and is likely also a socialist, that is, a believer in another idea that has incited innumerable acts of violence.
But Hamid Dabashi and his ilk care nothing for consistency. They see in the Christchurch mosque massacres a chance to silence all criticism of jihad mass murder, Sharia oppression, and mass Muslim migration into the West, and they’re making the most of it.
“When it comes to Islamophobia, we need to name names,” by Hamid Dabashi, Al Jazeera, March 31, 2019:
...How different are Bill Maher’s racist screeds from what a mass murderer wrote in his “manifesto": “An attack in New Zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where [sic] in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where [sic] left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration.”
The sweetheart of US and European liberals who even passes as a “leftist” believes: “I don’t have to apologize, do I, for not wanting the Western world to be taken over by Islam in three hundred years?”
Someone explain to HBO executives the difference between that hate speech and this by the mass murderer in New Zealand: “It’s the birthrates. It’s the birthrates. It’s the birthrates. If there is one thing I want you to remember from these writings, its [sic] that the birthrates must change. Even if we were to deport all Non-Europeans from our lands tomorrow, the European people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death.”
Somewhere in his “manifesto” the Australian mass murderer asks: “Why attack Muslims [sic] if all high fertility immigrants are the issue?” To which he responds: “Historical, societal and statistical reasons. They are the most despised group of invaders in the West, attacking them receives the greatest level of support.”
We must and we will name names: I hold Bill Maher chief among many other racist hoodlums responsible for the slaughter of every single one of those 50 innocent souls in Christchurch. I hold Bill Maher and HBO responsible for this and all other mass murders in which Muslims were the target.
