Harvey Weinstein and Tariq Ramadan: A Comparison

Today’s feminists and “freedom fighters” burn Weinstein in effigy, but do not believe the women charging Tariq Ramadan. How convenient.

They stone them? Nothing happens They mutilate them? Nothing happens. They prevent them from witnessing in court? Nothing. They lash them? Nothing. They throw acid in their faces? Nothing. They take their children away? Nothing. They lock them in burqas? Nothing. They prevent them from studying? Nothing. They control the inches of eyes they can show in public? Nothing. They marry them by force, even young girls? Nothing.

And now that their paladin, Tariq Ramadan, has been accused of having abused so many of these Muslim girls in Europe’s cities, what are the official Islamic organizations, the feminists and Western progressives, doing? They defend Ramadan, they lurk in the shadows, they keep silent, they talk about something else, they take time out, they shout about the “Islamophobic conspiracy.”

They burn Harvey Weinstein in effigy, but they do not believe the women charging Tariq Ramadan.

It is probably because they want to cover up the fact that Tariq Ramadan’s case is much more important than the Harvey Weinstein one.

On the one hand, there is a Hollywodian producer who asked for sex in exchange for favors, on the other hand an Islamic preacher, a religious and cultural symbol for millions, equivalent to a cardinal, who subjugated and raped women.

Weinstein was a rich powerful guy, Ramadan a guru with a beard and headgear.

Weinstein’s victims are all very famous, Ramadan’s are poor and anonymous.

Weinstein’s victims are the new icons of feminism, Ramadan’s are often not even known by name, they are threatened with death by their own communities.

The press loved to investigate in the Weinstein case, while their silence has been obscene on Ramadan.

Weinstein was immediately deprived of all his honors, while Ramadan was defended by his Oxford colleagues as “a prominent Muslim”.

Weinstein did not tell women how they should live and dress, Ramadan did it for decades.

Weinstein doesn’t want to conquer Europe, Ramadan does.

In the Weinstein case reporters have become heroes, those who covered Ramadan, such as Charlie Hebdo, are now threatened with death.

The reason for so many inequalities? The Ayatollah Khomeini once said: “There is no humour in Islam”. Those who touch it, those who dare to criticize it, die.

Giulio Meotti is a Rome-based journalist for Il Foglio national newspaper. He is the author of twenty books, including A New Shoah: The Untold Story of Israel’s Victims of Terrorism, The Last Western Pope (translated into Spanish and Polish), The End of Europe (Prize Capri San Michele), and The Sweet Conquest (with a preface by Algerian novelist Boualem Sansal) about the creeping Islamization of Europe. He writes a weekly column for Arutz Sheva and has contributed to the Wall Street Journal, the Jerusalem Post, Gatestone Institute, and Die Weltwoche.
See more from this Author
European Governments Who Realize That Their Fifth Column Is Now Too Big to Be Governed Are Using the Repression of Critics as Appeasement
If You Ask Wikipedia How Many Muslims There Are in France, It Will Answer Answer ‘From 3 to 5/7 million,’ but the P.M. Says There Are 9 Million
Europe’s Silent Surrender to Antisemitism
See more on this Topic
Interim Harvard Dean of Social Science David M. Cutler ’87 Dismissed the Faculty Leaders of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies
George Washington University’s Failure to Remove MESA from Its Middle East Studies Program Shows a Continued Tolerance for the Promotion of Terrorism