Elon Musk X-poses: Ongoing Censorship of Muslim Violence against Christians

Published originally under the title "Elon Musk X-poses: Globalist Censorship of Muslim Violence against Christians."

This text differs slightly from The Steam's version.

Winfield Myers

A bearded teen crying “Allahu akbar!” stabbed Orthodox Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel as he delivered a sermon in his Sydney, Australia, church, on April 15, 2024. (Photo: X)


Last week, a bearded teen of Middle Eastern appearance, armed with a knife and crying Islam’s war cry — “Allahu akbar!” (Allah is greater!) — savagely stabbed an Orthodox Christian clergyman, Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel, as he was delivering a sermon from the pulpit of his church in Sydney, Australia. The attack was captured on video as the worship service was livestreaming.

While this incident may strike some as startling, for those in the know, it’s quite common. Off the top of my head, I can think of two separate accounts — both from Egypt — where “radical” Muslims stabbed to death two Orthodox priests in public. (This is to say nothing of the dozens, if not hundreds, of Christians killed by “Allahu akbar"-screaming Muslims on any given month around the world — most in sub-Saharan Africa.)

The stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari is wholly unsurprising and falls in line with the Muslim stabbings of “infidels” that occur with great regularity around the world.

Nor is the Sydney stabbing surprising in light of a communique issued by the Islamic State (“ISIS”) earlier this year, the title of which paraphrases Koran 9:5: “Kill Them [Non-Muslims] Wherever You Find Them.” In it, the Muslim terror group called on the “Lions of Islam” (Muslims around the world) to terrorize and kill “infidels” — including by “cut[ting] their throats with sharp knives.” It specifically named Christians and Jews, and churches and synagogues, as ideal targets.

In short, the stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari is wholly unsurprising and falls in line with the Muslim stabbings of “infidels” that occur with great regularity around the world — and increasingly so in the Western world. For instance, a Muslim migrant randomly stabbed three toddlers and their babysitter in a Catholic school in Ireland last November; or when, a few days earlier in France, a gang of machete- and knife-wielding Muslims descended on a village festival, where they murdered one 16-year-old boy and seriously wounded nearly 20 others.

Why Are We Even Shocked?

Why the Sydney incident continues to shock people in the West, however, is being brought out in the open by an ongoing quarrel between the Australian government and X (Twitter).

On April 19, Australian officials ordered X to remove the video evidence of the stabbing in Sydney. X complied, blocking the video within Australia. But such acquiescence was only met with a greater demand — to “globally withhold these posts or face a daily fine of $785,000 AUD (about $500,000 USD).”

In response, X’s Global Government Affairs team said:

While X respects the right of a country to enforce its laws within its jurisdiction, the eSafety Commissioner [of Australia] does not have the authority to dictate what content X’s users can see globally. ... Global takedown orders go against the very principles of a free and open internet and threaten free speech everywhere.

Most recently, on April 23, an Australian judge — who thinks his jurisdiction extends to the entire world — ruled that X must block the video from all users around the globe (which includes sovereign American citizens).

An Australian judge — who thinks his jurisdiction extends to the entire world — ruled that X must block the video from all users around the globe.

“The Australian censorship commissar is demanding *global* content bans!” outraged X owner Elon Musk responded, adding that it is “absurd for any one country to attempt to censor the entire world.”

The crime victim himself, Bishop Mar Mari, has spoken up in support of Musk’s decision:

“I do acknowledge the Australian government’s desire to have the videos removed because of their graphic nature,” Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel said in audio posted on YouTube on Wednesday.

“However, noting our God-given right to freedom of speech, and freedom of religion, I’m not opposed to the videos remaining on social media,” Emmanuel added.

The Only Violence Our Media Won’t Show You

For the record, the brief video is actually quite tame. All that appears is the back of the culprit as he approaches the preaching bishop; then he lunges at and appears to punch him repeatedly —which is what the stabbing motions look like, as the switchblade is not visible (some say it never even opened) and no blood appears to be drawn.

The Australian government wants to delete the video evidence of a Muslim stabbing a Christian lest you see it and naively believe your lying eyes.

Hollywood treats Western eyes to far more gratuitous violence — not to mention endless filth and garbage — on a daily basis, but no one seems to care about that.

Could it be that it’s not the violence the Australian government and others are trying to hide, but rather the sheer facts on display: a Muslim man physically assaulting a Christian while hollering Islamic slogans? Not only is this a more plausible explanation for the Australian government’s censorship efforts, but the prime minister is giving this interpretation much more credence by condemning the video — sheer, objective fact — as “misinformation” and “disinformation.” In Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s own words:

We know, I think overwhelmingly, Australians want misinformation and disinformation to stop. This isn’t about freedom of expression. This is about the dangerous implications that can occur when things that are simply not true, that everyone knows is not true, are replicated and weaponized in order to cause division and in this case to promote negative statements and potentially to just inflame what was a very difficult situation.

Simply put, the Australian government wants to delete the video evidence of a Muslim stabbing a Christian lest you see it and naively believe your lying eyes.

The silver lining in this fiasco between Australia and X is that, by not immediately capitulating and daring to resist these demands, X has exposed the sort of censorship that routinely goes on under the radar by governmental bodies and media the world over — especially when it comes to the otherwise unknown pandemic of Muslims persecuting Christians.

Raymond Ibrahim, author of Defenders of the West and Sword and Scimitar, is the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and the Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Raymond Ibrahim, a specialist in Islamic history and doctrine, is the author of Defenders of the West: The Christian Heroes Who Stood Against Islam (2022); Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (2018); Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013); and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). He has appeared on C-SPAN, Al-Jazeera, CNN, NPR, and PBS and has been published by the New York Times Syndicate, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Financial Times, the Weekly Standard, the Chronicle of Higher Education, and Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst. Formerly an Arabic linguist at the Library of Congress, Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, briefs governmental agencies, and testifies before Congress. He has been a visiting fellow/scholar at a variety of Institutes—from the Hoover Institution to the National Intelligence University—and is the Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum and the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
See more from this Author
The Materialistic West Increasingly Only Understands Motives Prompted by Material Needs or Desires
On Oct. 12, Two Coptic Christian Priests Were Forced to Hold the Funeral for Their Father in the Middle of a Public Street
The Incident Had Britons Protesting in the Streets Against the Government’s Unchecked Migration Policies
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.