Le Pens at War over Jew-Hate? Think Again

Jean-Marie Le Pen (left), who founded the National Front in 1972, recently called his daughter Marine (right), the party’s president since 2011, a modern “Judas.”

The famous TV series Game of Thrones has roots in French history: it was modelled on The Accursed Kings, a novel by Maurice Druon about the medieval French monarchy.

It is now French politics that looks increasingly like Game of Thrones. Or, at least, French far-right politics. Marine Le Pen, 46, the National Front’s chairman since 2011, “declared war” on her father, Jean-Marie, 86, who founded the party in 1972 and ran it for almost 40 years. And Jean-Marie is striking back.

On the face of it, antisemitism is the issue. On April 2, Mr Le Pen reiterated on BFM TV a view he first made known in 1987, that “ascertaining whether there was such a thing as gas chambers was a small detail in Second World War history.” Asked whether he retrospectively “regretted” having said such a thing, the elder Le Pen replied: “Absolutely not, because this is the historical truth.”

Five days later, in an interview with the far-right weekly Rivarol, Mr Le Pen said that he would neither change his mind nor “crawl before the public” on these matters. Moreover, he praised Marshall Pétain’s pro-Nazi regime - which was instrumental in the persecution and rounding up of Jews from 1940 to 1944 - and insisted that guilt over the Shoah was the main reason why France was not able to cope with its immigration problem. Finally, he resorted to classic Christian antisemitism to describe Marine Le Pen as a modern “Judas” and her advisers as a “Sanhedrin.”

86% of NF supporters agree with Ms Le Pen and disapprove of her father’s behaviour.

Ms Le Pen published a statement attacking her father’s “scorched earth” and “suicidal” behaviour, and said that it went against the party line and the party’s interests. As a result, she made it clear she intended to take action against her father, including barring him from running as the top National Front candidate in Provence in the December regional elections.

Several of Ms Le Pen’s closest friends and advisers were even more explicit in their condemnation of Mr Le Pen. Louis Aliot, the Front’s vice chairman and Marine’s partner, tweeted that Mr Le Pen’s interview with “that nondescript antisemitic publication, Rivarol” was “absolutely scandalous.” Florian Philipot, another vice-chairman and the architect of the National Front’s current “left-wing” strategy, posted that the point of no return had been reached. The National Front’s rank and file seem to agree: 86 per cent of NF supporters agree with Ms Le Pen and disapprove of her father’s behaviour.

Many observers think that the real issue might be internal feuding within the Le Pen family.

While Marine managed to keep the National Front alive and even take it to new electoral highs (over 20 per cent of the national vote on average), she has a potential rival in the form of her younger, charismatic niece, Marion Maréchal Le Pen, 25, a granddaughter of Jean-Marie by another daughter. Marion seems to enjoy Mr Le Pen’s support. She takes a much more right-wing stance than Marine on many topics.

A further working hypothesis is that there is no feud at all between Jean-Marie and Marine. The whole story may have been staged in order to boost Marine’s image as a moderate - and to pave the way for Marion Maréchal Le Pen to become the party champion in Provence.

Michel Gurfinkiel, a Shillman-Ginsburg Fellow at the Middle East Forum, is the Founder and President of the Jean-Jacques Rousseau Institute, a conservative think tank in France,

A scholar of European Islamism, Turkey, and the Arab-Israeli conflict, Michel Gurfinkiel is founder and president of the Jean-Jacques Rousseau Institute, a Paris-based think tank, and a former editor-in-chief of Valeurs Actuelles, France’s foremost conservative weekly magazine. A French national, he studied history and semitics at the Sorbonne and the French National Institute for Oriental Languages and Civilizations. Gurfinkiel is author of eight books and a frequent contributor to American media, including the Middle East Quarterly, Commentary, PJMedia, Wall Street Journal, and Weekly Standard.
See more from this Author
From the Sykes-Picot Agreement to Abu Mohamed Al-Julani’s Lightning Revolution
Does the President’s Resolve That a Soccer Game with an Israeli Team Go On Represent His Definitive Stance on the Issue or Just Another Political Pivot?
The Story of the Palestinian Arab Flag Holds Some Surprises Which Just Might Make Its Bearers Think Twice
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.