Muslims Seek to ‘Avenge’ the Battle of Tours

The Three Suspects Allegedly Wanted to Avenge the Arab-Berber Troops Defeated in 732 by Charles Martel at the Battle of Poitiers

Shutterstock

Among all the other reasons Muslims turn to terrorism, we can now add “to avenge lost battles of history.” Seriously. For example, last month,

Three young men who were said to have been radicalised have been charged with alleged criminal terrorist conspiracy by France’s intelligence services… Allegedly inspired by jihadist ideology, the individuals are suspected of planning at least one violent act in the central-eastern city of Poitier involving “homemade bombs.”… [O]ne of the suspects was the son of an imam from the Saint-Brieuc city mosque and a former Muslim chaplain at the prison in the same Breton town… One aged 19 and the others 20, the three suspects were students in chemistry, psychology and computer science… According to the investigation by the authorities, the three men allegedly wanted to avenge the Arab-Berber troops defeated in 732 by Charles Martel at the Battle of Poitiers.

While much can be said about this development, consider what it reveals about the two civilizations in question — that of Muslims, and that which was once headed by men such as Charles “the Hammer” Martel.

The battle of Tours in 732 AD was indeed a watershed moment (I’ve dedicated an entire chapter to it in Sword and Scimitar). One leading historian, Godefroid Kurth (d. 1916), presented it as “one of the great events in the history of the world, as upon its issue depended whether Christian Civilization should continue or Islam prevail throughout Europe.”

As such, isn’t it interesting that, on the one hand, Muslims still remember and seek to avenge themselves against this battle, and, on the other, most Western people know absolutely nothing about it? Bernard Lewis once explained this strange dichotomy: “most Muslims, unlike most Americans, have an intense historical awareness and see current events in a much deeper and broader perspective than we normally do.”

Knowing Your History

Surely this is putting it mildly. If anything, Muslims are increasingly walking in perfect continuity with their history — one which featured invasions, terrorization, and conquests of non-Muslim lands; and Westerners are increasingly walking in perfect discontinuity with their history — one which featured Europeans defending against invading Muslims.

Isn’t it interesting that, on the one hand, Muslims still remember and seek to avenge themselves against this battle, and, on the other, most Western people know absolutely nothing about it?

Meanwhile, if Muslims are aware of and regularly celebrate their jihadist past, the West does everything to forget and whitewash over a millennium of Muslim atrocities, while condemning and pulling out of context the deeds of its own ancestors, the Crusaders being a prime example.

This inability to appreciate true history, including its unwavering continuity, has naturally spilled into how the West completely misunderstands current events. Put differently, because the West has insisted on a lie — that Islam was historically peaceful and tolerant — it naturally cannot understand the ideology that fuels modern-day jihadist aggression, and therefore always attributes it to something else: “grievances,” mental disturbances, territorial disputes, and so forth.

The Fox and the Hedgehog

As for those many other acts of Muslim violence that are too difficult to chalk up to “grievances” — such as the persecution (sometimes genocide) of Christians under Islam; systematic attacks on European churches; and sexual assaults on or grooming of infidel women — these are simply not discussed because they are, for historically amnesiac Westerners, “inexplicable,” not to mention the way they throw a wrench into the “narrative” we are all supposed to accept without question.

This, incidentally, is why every single Muslim terror attack is always presented as something “new,” a disparate phenomenon to be understood on its own, with an endless supply of media talking heads “explaining” (often wrongly) what should otherwise be commonsensical.

Much of this dichotomy is captured by a fragment from the ancient Greek poet Archilochus: “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.” Discussing the significance of this obscure aphorism in his The Hedgehog and the Fox (1953), Isiah Berlin wrote,

There exists a great chasm between those, on one side, [Hedgehogs/Muslims] who relate everything to a single central vision, one system, less or more coherent or articulate, in terms of which they understand, think and feel – a single, universal, organising principle in terms of which alone all that they are and say has significance – and, on the other side, those [Foxes/Westerners] who pursue many ends, often unrelated and even contradictory, connected, if at all, only in some de facto way, for some psychological or physiological cause, related to no moral or aesthetic principle.
Isaiah Berlin

An online article offers a more simplistic definition:

If you adopt fox-like thinking you rely on various pieces of information to form your view on an issue and think about it from different angles. You’re also willing to admit when you’re uncertain. But if you have more of a hedgehog mindset, you develop your world views and predictions with a central, overarching principle in mind and talk about your views with more confidence.

Thus, the Muslim’s “hedgehog” strength lies in the fact that he sees the world and his place in it according to one big idea — namely, Islam, and how Islam has always behaved. As for the Western “fox,” nothing is connected; there is no overarching understanding of anything; everything is “nuanced” and often presented in a vacuum, never part of an obvious continuum. Hence why everything is “new” and presented as the news (with the pun on Fox News being unavoidable).

Incidentally, one need look no further than to France, where this latest terror plot to “avenge Tours” was busted, to see all of the aforementioned dynamics at work in stark display. Historically, France produced more crusaders and spearheaded more crusades against Islam than any other European nation. Yet today it is among the most accommodating nations to Muslims, and has arguably the largest Muslim population of Europe.

Thus, Muslims continue to walk in the footsteps of their ancestors, while Western people have been conditioned to be the mirror opposite of theirs—to their own detriment.

Raymond Ibrahim, a specialist in Islamic history and doctrine, is the author of Defenders of the West: The Christian Heroes Who Stood Against Islam (2022); Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (2018); Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013); and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). He has appeared on C-SPAN, Al-Jazeera, CNN, NPR, and PBS and has been published by the New York Times Syndicate, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Financial Times, the Weekly Standard, the Chronicle of Higher Education, and Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst. Formerly an Arabic linguist at the Library of Congress, Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, briefs governmental agencies, and testifies before Congress. He has been a visiting fellow/scholar at a variety of Institutes—from the Hoover Institution to the National Intelligence University—and is the Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum and the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
See more from this Author
It Encapsulates the Misrepresentations and Errors of History That Have Caused the West to Become Clueless About the Roots of Its Conflict with the Islam
If It Looks Like a Duck, Walks Like a Duck, and Quacks Like a Duck, Then It’s Probably a Duck
Focusing On Issues We Find Offensive but Which Do Not Affect Non-Muslims Creates Confusion Concerning Aspects of Islam That Affect So-Called Infidels
See more on this Topic
Trump Is a Consummate Deal-Maker, and Iranian Officials Signal They Are Ready for a Deal
The Multifaceted and Layered Plan Entails Crafting a Hateful Narrative to Vilify Israel Through the Predominantly Government-Controlled Turkish Media
The Executive Order’s Central Thrust Is to Restore, Repair, and Expand National Security Vetting Across Every Agency That Might Touch Immigration