Combating Campus Antisemitism Isn’t a ‘Weaponization’ of an Injustice, but a Moral and Legal Imperative

Attempts to Portray the Fight Against Campus Antisemitism as a Form of Political Subterfuge Are Profoundly Dangerous

Thousands an anti-Israel protesters gather at an encampment at UCLA on Monday, April 29, 2024.

Thousands an anti-Israel protesters gather at an encampment at UCLA on Monday, April 29, 2024.

Shutterstock

Recent attempts to portray the fight against campus antisemitism as a form of political subterfuge are not only misleading but profoundly dangerous. A recent screed titled Weaponizing Antisemitism 101: A Back-to-School Special by Roy Eidelson, former director of the Solomon Asch Center for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict at the University of Pennsylvania, epitomizes this misguided narrative. It paints a picture in which legitimate outrage over antisemitic harassment is dismissed as a cynical ploy to stifle free speech. This could not be further from the truth. The reality is that antisemitism is on the rise across U.S. college campuses, and far from being “weaponized,” efforts to address it are crucial to safeguarding the civil rights of Jewish students.

To be clear, criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic. What is antisemitic, however, is when that criticism morphs into harassment, intimidation and violence aimed at Jewish students, as has increasingly become the case on campuses nationwide. Groups like Students for Justice in Palestine frequently cross this line. What starts as political protest all too often escalates into coordinated efforts to silence, ostracize and threaten Jewish students merely for their association with Israel or even their Jewish identity.

Antisemitism is when that criticism morphs into harassment, intimidation, and violence aimed at Jewish students.

This is not a theoretical debate; it’s happening in real time. Jewish students are being harassed at campus events, labeled racists and face physical intimidation. Protests turn into mob-like demonstrations where chants like “From the river to the sea” suggest not political reform but the destruction of the State of Israel and its people. Such statements, whether knowingly or not, are calls for ethnic cleansing. To downplay this as mere “criticism” of Israeli policy is to willfully ignore a centuries-old pattern of antisemitic vitriol disguised in the politics of the day.

Efforts to address this surge in campus antisemitism, whether through civil rights laws or initiatives like the Anti-Klan Act from the 1870s and RICO statutes, are aimed at upholding the basic rights of Jewish students. It is appalling to suggest that invoking these legal protections is a form of “weaponization.” What is being protected are students’ rights to attend class, participate in campus life and express their identities without fear of harassment or violence. These are the same rights afforded to every other student group on campus, and Jewish students should not be excluded from these protections.

The claim that there is a deliberate conflation of anti-Israel activism with antisemitism is equally flawed. While it is true that not all criticism of Israel is antisemitic, many of the most vocal and aggressive movements on campuses have gone far beyond mere political discourse. They have blurred the line between critique of Israeli government policies and delegitimization of the Jewish people’s right to self-determination. This is antisemitism, plain and simple.

Moreover, dismissing the rise of antisemitism on the left, particularly among pro-Palestinian activists, is both naive and dangerous. Antisemitism is not confined to one political ideology. It exists on both the far-right and far-left, often manifesting in different forms but rooted in the same deep-seated prejudice. To suggest that antisemitism only flourishes on the political right is to ignore a growing and very real problem on the left. Turning a blind eye to this reality only emboldens those who wish to cause harm, whether they cloak their hatred in white nationalism or radical leftist rhetoric.

Jewish students are victims of organized campaigns designed to strip them of their sense of belonging in academic spaces.

The consequences of this escalating hostility toward Jewish students are already being felt. Jewish students report feeling isolated, threatened and unsafe on campuses that are meant to foster open and respectful dialogue. These students are not just victims of “mean words” but of organized campaigns designed to strip them of their sense of belonging in academic spaces. Pretending that this doesn’t exist or is somehow exaggerated serves only to perpetuate the cycle of abuse.

Finally, dismissing the psychological and emotional toll of antisemitism on campuses as “overblown” is an affront to those students who have been on the receiving end of this hatred. The impact of antisemitism is not something that can be measured by a single survey or a few statistics. It is felt in the everyday lives of Jewish students who have to constantly look over their shoulders, who are afraid to wear their kippah or Star of David (Magen David) in public, and who feel increasingly alienated in environments that should be welcoming and inclusive.

This is not about protecting Israel from criticism; it is about ensuring that Jewish students have the same rights and protections as every other student on campus. It is about calling out and condemning antisemitism in all its forms, regardless of whether it comes from the left or the right. And it is about taking action to ensure that this rising tide of hatred does not continue unchecked.

Efforts to combat antisemitism are not “weaponizations” of a historical injustice; they are moral and legal imperatives. To frame them otherwise is to deny the reality of what Jewish students are enduring today. It’s time to stop pretending that this problem is exaggerated or imagined and to recognize that antisemitism, in all its forms, is as real and dangerous today as it has ever been.

Published originally under the title “The Real Weaponization of antisemitism on U.S. Campuses.”

Gregg Roman is the executive director of the Middle East Forum, previously directing the Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh. In 2014, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency named him one of the “ten most inspiring global Jewish leaders,” and he previously served as the political advisor to the deputy foreign minister of Israel and worked for the Israeli Ministry of Defense. A frequent speaker on Middle East affairs, Mr. Roman appears on international news channels such as Fox News, i24NEWS, Al-Jazeera, BBC World News, and Israel’s Channels 12 and 13. He studied national security and political communications at American University and the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, and has contributed to The Hill, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, the Miami Herald, and the Jerusalem Post.
See more from this Author
Denying Iran a Nuclear Bomb and Freeing the Region from Tehran’s Grip Could Mitigate Any Negative Fallout from the Deal
‘America First’ Need Not Mean Isolationism—It Should Mean Carefully Assessing Which Overseas Investments Benefit America
The United States Historically Has Wielded Sanctions to Protect Citizens and Quell Threats Before They Spiral Into Conflict
See more on this Topic
Erdoğan May Despise NATO but He Realizes His Power Derives from It
Mounting Evidence Confirms That ISIS and Isis-K Have Been Exploiting Turkey as a Logistics Hub for Their Operations