Yes, Jihad Means ‘Struggle'; But That Makes it Even Worse

This is an abbreviated version of an article published originally under the title "Islam's Mein Kampf."

Winfield Myers

Today, there’s a foreign word that, though only meaning “struggle,” has led to the slaughter of countless tens of millions. But few want to acknowledge it.

Jihad Literally Means ‘Struggle’

This is the Arabic word jihad. Although it used to be translated as “holy war” in English — and for good reason, as we’ll see — it literally means “struggle.”

The Columbian, for example, recently published an article titled, “Word ‘jihad’ often misused” to emphasize that,

Contrary to its popular use in the media, jihad simply refers to a ‘struggle.’ Muslims use the term foremost to discuss a spiritual struggle against one’s passions and vices.

As closely examined here, the latter claim is pure, unadulterated nonsense.

That said, the claim that jihad literally means “struggle” — not “holy war” — is absolutely correct. However, this only leads to a massive and rather overlooked irony: those who insist on translating jihad as “struggle,” do so thinking they are exonerating this notorious Arabic word from the divisiveness and violence surrounding it. In reality, however, it is only when one understands that jihad literally means struggle that one comes to understand just how dangerous, multifaceted, and subversive the jihad truly is.

‘A Holy War Against Infidels’

Let us go to the beginning, etymology. Here is how the authoritative Hans-Wehr’s Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic translates the root j-h-d (from which the word jihad is derived): “to strive, endeavor, labor, take pains, and exhaust on behalf or for the sake of something [namely Islam].”

Published in 1961 — that is, before the age of political correctness — the academically rigorous dictionary also makes it a point to place under the j-h-d entry the word jihad, which is translated as “fight, battle; jihad, holy war against the infidels, as a religious duty.”

There is a very good reason for this subcategorized entry. Historically, jihad always manifested itself as a “holy war against infidels.” It revolved around expanding (occasionally, as during the Crusades, defending) the borders of Islam.

Century after century, the only way for Muslim empires to expand into non-Muslim territory was through offensive warfare. Pre-modern Europeans were still zealous for their faith and culture, and thus not about to submit to Islam without a struggle. So force — Islamic invasion and conquest — was the only way to effectively practice jihad.

Empowering Islam Over the West

Times have changed. With the modern, meteoric rise of the West in material terms, a lax if not gullible attitude has come to prevail, allowing some Muslims to exercise the root meaning of jihad. If they can no longer subjugate the infidel through conventional war, they can at least, to quote from the aforementioned definition, “strive, endeavor, labor, take pains, and exhaust on behalf or for the sake of something” — namely, empowering Islam over the West.

This struggle (jihad) takes many forms. One of the most obvious is known in Arabic as jihad al-lissan — jihad of the tongue — or in English, propaganda. This jihad takes the form of apologetics for Islam and polemics against the West —many of which consist of out-and-out lies. It emanates from Muslim academics, activists, journalists, politicians, and others.

Even the Islamic State, which embodies the concept of jihad as “holy war” more than any other organization today, regularly reminds its followers not to neglect the jihad of the tongue. According to a 2022 report,

The Islamist terrorist group Islamic State-Khorasan Province (ISKP) has urged its supporters and recruits to emphasize media warfare in addition to military combat. ‘Fighting with the tongue is as important as fighting physically,’ ISKP stated in a new issue of their magazine.

‘Charities’ That Really Fund Extremism

Another form of striving, recommended both in the Koran and Hadith, is known as jihad al-mal — the “money jihad.” Instead of physically participating in jihad, a Muslim supports it financially or materially.

This used to be the caliphate’s responsibility. Nowadays and in its absence, every day Muslims — including those living in the West — finance the jihad with their zakat, or “alms.” For example, in 2001, the U.S. government designated the Holy Land Foundation — once the largest Islamic charity group in the United States — as a terrorist organization dedicated to financing Hamas’s jihad/terrorism against Israel.

Breeding Our Future Overlords

Yet another is the demographic jihad — also known as the “baby-jihad” (jihad al-wilada). Muslim men “strive” to breed with as many women as possible — Muslim or non-Muslim — in order to increase the ranks of Islam vis-à-vis increasingly sterile infidels. This is not just a lusty rationalization for illicit sex; Islamic clerics laud this “endeavor” as a legitimate jihad. Its success can be seen in Western Europe, some regions of which now have more newborn babies named Muhammad than traditional, European names.

In short, yes, the word “jihad” does not simply mean “holy war” to empower Islam over infidels. It means any “endeavor,” any kind of “striving” or “labor” — in a word, struggle — that empowers Islam over infidels. Citing this fact, as the apologists often do, should not create less but more apprehension concerning the jihad.

Raymond Ibrahim is the Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Raymond Ibrahim, a specialist in Islamic history and doctrine, is the author of Defenders of the West: The Christian Heroes Who Stood Against Islam (2022); Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (2018); Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013); and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). He has appeared on C-SPAN, Al-Jazeera, CNN, NPR, and PBS and has been published by the New York Times Syndicate, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Financial Times, the Weekly Standard, the Chronicle of Higher Education, and Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst. Formerly an Arabic linguist at the Library of Congress, Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, briefs governmental agencies, and testifies before Congress. He has been a visiting fellow/scholar at a variety of Institutes—from the Hoover Institution to the National Intelligence University—and is the Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum and the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
See more from this Author
The Materialistic West Increasingly Only Understands Motives Prompted by Material Needs or Desires
On Oct. 12, Two Coptic Christian Priests Were Forced to Hold the Funeral for Their Father in the Middle of a Public Street
The Incident Had Britons Protesting in the Streets Against the Government’s Unchecked Migration Policies
See more on this Topic
I recently witnessed something I haven’t seen in a long time. On Friday, August 16, 2024, a group of pro-Hamas activists packed up their signs and went home in the face of spirited and non-violent opposition from a coalition of pro-American Iranians and American Jews. The last time I saw anything like that happen was in 2006 or 2007, when I led a crowd of Israel supporters in chants in order to silence a heckler standing on the sidewalk near the town common in Amherst, Massachusetts. The ridicule was enough to prompt him and his fellow anti-Israel activists to walk away, as we cheered their departure. It was glorious.